<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash: Is It Trash or King?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/</link>
	<description>In search of a better balance in money ... and in life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:47:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-4087</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-4087</guid>
		<description>A really interesting article.

I see cash as &#039;opportunity money&#039; rather than safety money so I&#039;m surprised about your huge current allocation -I guess I&#039;m not convinced about deflation.

That said, the great thing about this article is that it promotes thinking about allocation, rather than just maintaining the status quo and its great being in a position to even make a decision about what to do with cash- lots of people have no cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really interesting article.</p>
<p>I see cash as &#8216;opportunity money&#8217; rather than safety money so I&#8217;m surprised about your huge current allocation -I guess I&#8217;m not convinced about deflation.</p>
<p>That said, the great thing about this article is that it promotes thinking about allocation, rather than just maintaining the status quo and its great being in a position to even make a decision about what to do with cash- lots of people have no cash.<br />
<span class="cluv">Adam´s latest post ..<a class="d0315beb96 4087" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/magicalpenny/~3/7Jx1B67aVt4/">Final Salary Pensions</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of Wealth &#8211; August 7, 2010 Edition — Personal Dividends - Money+Lifestyle</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3884</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of Wealth &#8211; August 7, 2010 Edition — Personal Dividends - Money+Lifestyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3884</guid>
		<description>[...] Money, saying, &#8220;The power of compound interest is why we all invest!&#8221;2 Cents presents Cash: Is It Trash or King? posted at Balance Junkie, saying, &#8220;Here&#8217;s a look at the pros and cons of holding cash [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money, saying, &#8220;The power of compound interest is why we all invest!&#8221;2 Cents presents Cash: Is It Trash or King? posted at Balance Junkie, saying, &#8220;Here&#8217;s a look at the pros and cons of holding cash [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Round-up of Financial Blogs Canadian Business Blogs &#124; Advice on Investment in Canada, Stock Market, Small Businesses Opportunities</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3755</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Round-up of Financial Blogs Canadian Business Blogs &#124; Advice on Investment in Canada, Stock Market, Small Businesses Opportunities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3755</guid>
		<description>[...] Balance Junkie believes that cash remains “the ultimate diversifier” in a world where asset correlations are rising (her allocation: 90% cash). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Balance Junkie believes that cash remains “the ultimate diversifier” in a world where asset correlations are rising (her allocation: 90% cash). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3723</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3723</guid>
		<description>It sounds like you have a solid plan. I&#039;d be pretty happy with $100K in income too. Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you have a solid plan. I&#8217;d be pretty happy with $100K in income too. Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of Money Carnival, # Sexty-two &#171; Finance Blog</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3722</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of Money Carnival, # Sexty-two &#171; Finance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3722</guid>
		<description>[...] Cents from Balance Junkie: Cash: Is It Trash or King? Is cash the safest place for your money in the current environment or will it hurt your investment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cents from Balance Junkie: Cash: Is It Trash or King? Is cash the safest place for your money in the current environment or will it hurt your investment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Samurai</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 02:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>Cash is the mofu King baby!

I earn about $25,000 a year risk free in interest income just from the cash sitting in various CDs in various banks.

There is NOTHING I would do to take out my cash and invest it in something else.  That&#039;s what my company stock, 401K are for, and there&#039;s enough of it invested after you&#039;ve been contributing for a number years.

10 more years, and I hope to accumulate enough cash to return $100,000 a year risk free.  I&#039;m not greedy and will hapily live off that.

Best,

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cash is the mofu King baby!</p>
<p>I earn about $25,000 a year risk free in interest income just from the cash sitting in various CDs in various banks.</p>
<p>There is NOTHING I would do to take out my cash and invest it in something else.  That&#8217;s what my company stock, 401K are for, and there&#8217;s enough of it invested after you&#8217;ve been contributing for a number years.</p>
<p>10 more years, and I hope to accumulate enough cash to return $100,000 a year risk free.  I&#8217;m not greedy and will hapily live off that.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Sam<br />
<span class="cluv">Financial Samurai´s latest post ..<a class="5fe61f2a06 3710" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.financialsamurai.com/2010/07/26/why-are-the-employed-so-smug-about-the-unemployed/">Why Are The Employed So Smug About The Unemployed</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>You make some good points regarding Treasuries, but I still prefer cash for its simplicity and liquidity. You can get in or out of cash at any time, whereas you may need to hold short term debt instruments to maturity to avoid capital losses. Many CDs (GICs in Canada) or even high interest savings accounts pay as much or more than short term debt instruments without the fees and hassles of buying individual bonds. 

TIPS do provide great inflation protection, but the yield on some of them actually went negative yesterday due to the current deflationary fears. Again, I would rather have cash.

I do think that there is a place for bonds in every portfolio, but for safety, simplicity and liquidity, you just can&#039;t beat cash. Thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points regarding Treasuries, but I still prefer cash for its simplicity and liquidity. You can get in or out of cash at any time, whereas you may need to hold short term debt instruments to maturity to avoid capital losses. Many CDs (GICs in Canada) or even high interest savings accounts pay as much or more than short term debt instruments without the fees and hassles of buying individual bonds. </p>
<p>TIPS do provide great inflation protection, but the yield on some of them actually went negative yesterday due to the current deflationary fears. Again, I would rather have cash.</p>
<p>I do think that there is a place for bonds in every portfolio, but for safety, simplicity and liquidity, you just can&#8217;t beat cash. Thanks for stopping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3654</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>1. &quot;Cash is the safest investment...FDIC...[etc.]&quot; In the ultimate sense of the the word &quot;safe&quot; - that is, risk of total loss - Treasuries have the same level of backing. Of course they can temporarily lose value between purchase and maturity, but you are paid for that risk. And you have the option of full inflation protection, which you can never get with cash or any cash equivalent.

2. &quot;If deflation is the order of the day, cash is the place to be.&quot; Treasuries aren&#039;t significantly different. Obviously they can fluctuate in value, but that is true compared to cash in all environments - it&#039;s not something that comes about because of deflation anymore than because of inflation. Owning high-quality, fixed-rate debt during deflationary periods is great. The slowdown doesn&#039;t hurt it because it&#039;s high-quality, and the fixed rate is effectively increased by the deflation.

3. &quot;Economic slowdowns and volatility can lead investors to reduce risk by selling other asset classes, thereby driving their prices down significantly. Cash doesn’t usually experience these big swings.&quot; Ditto for high-quality, short-term debt. In fact it will often get driven up under these circumstances. Check out the Vanguard Treasury funds during the recent slowdown and volatility.

4. &quot;If you don’t hold a decent amount of cash, you won’t be ready to buy when other asset classes get hit.&quot; Unless you were holding high-quality debt, which wouldn&#039;t get hit with those other asset classes, as above.

At a macro level it is obvious why this would be the case. If you are holding short-term, nominal Treasuries you are earning just a bit of return but your principle is going to behave nearly identically to cash. You&#039;ll still be liquid because it&#039;s not going to vary much from the equivalent cash position. If you are holding long-term, nominal Treasuries then you win when reality holds more deflation than they were priced for, and lose if it holds more inflation. If you are holding TIPS then your *real* returns will mimic the stability of the short-term nominals (low but steady real return), thought you may experience significant value fluctuations between purchase and maturity.

Any of those choices might make more sense based on the investor&#039;s situation, but short-term, nominal Treasuries are going to have a small return in virtually every environment, including deflation. Unless you can match that return in CD&#039;s, the bonds are preferable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. &#8220;Cash is the safest investment&#8230;FDIC&#8230;[etc.]&#8221; In the ultimate sense of the the word &#8220;safe&#8221; &#8211; that is, risk of total loss &#8211; Treasuries have the same level of backing. Of course they can temporarily lose value between purchase and maturity, but you are paid for that risk. And you have the option of full inflation protection, which you can never get with cash or any cash equivalent.</p>
<p>2. &#8220;If deflation is the order of the day, cash is the place to be.&#8221; Treasuries aren&#8217;t significantly different. Obviously they can fluctuate in value, but that is true compared to cash in all environments &#8211; it&#8217;s not something that comes about because of deflation anymore than because of inflation. Owning high-quality, fixed-rate debt during deflationary periods is great. The slowdown doesn&#8217;t hurt it because it&#8217;s high-quality, and the fixed rate is effectively increased by the deflation.</p>
<p>3. &#8220;Economic slowdowns and volatility can lead investors to reduce risk by selling other asset classes, thereby driving their prices down significantly. Cash doesn’t usually experience these big swings.&#8221; Ditto for high-quality, short-term debt. In fact it will often get driven up under these circumstances. Check out the Vanguard Treasury funds during the recent slowdown and volatility.</p>
<p>4. &#8220;If you don’t hold a decent amount of cash, you won’t be ready to buy when other asset classes get hit.&#8221; Unless you were holding high-quality debt, which wouldn&#8217;t get hit with those other asset classes, as above.</p>
<p>At a macro level it is obvious why this would be the case. If you are holding short-term, nominal Treasuries you are earning just a bit of return but your principle is going to behave nearly identically to cash. You&#8217;ll still be liquid because it&#8217;s not going to vary much from the equivalent cash position. If you are holding long-term, nominal Treasuries then you win when reality holds more deflation than they were priced for, and lose if it holds more inflation. If you are holding TIPS then your *real* returns will mimic the stability of the short-term nominals (low but steady real return), thought you may experience significant value fluctuations between purchase and maturity.</p>
<p>Any of those choices might make more sense based on the investor&#8217;s situation, but short-term, nominal Treasuries are going to have a small return in virtually every environment, including deflation. Unless you can match that return in CD&#8217;s, the bonds are preferable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3645</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3645</guid>
		<description>Yeah. There&#039;s definitely no &quot;one size fits all&quot; strategy here, but I think we sometimes forget that reducing risk can be as easy as raising cash. Thanks Shawn! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. There&#8217;s definitely no &#8220;one size fits all&#8221; strategy here, but I think we sometimes forget that reducing risk can be as easy as raising cash. Thanks Shawn! <img src='http://balancejunkie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roshawn @ Watson Inc</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3643</link>
		<dc:creator>Roshawn @ Watson Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3643</guid>
		<description>Very thoughtful analysis of the merits of keeping cash in your portfolio. One&#039;s risk tolerance does seem to vary based on age and level of wealth... Good stuff 2cents!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thoughtful analysis of the merits of keeping cash in your portfolio. One&#8217;s risk tolerance does seem to vary based on age and level of wealth&#8230; Good stuff 2cents!<br />
<span class="cluv">Roshawn @ Watson Inc´s latest post ..<a class="6b835cdefc 3643" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WatsonInc/~3/VBQL-Fwdkm8/hey-broke-people-stop-overpaying-for.html">Hey Broke People- Stop Overpaying For College!</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Cash: Is It Trash or King? &#124; Balance Junkie -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3641</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Cash: Is It Trash or King? &#124; Balance Junkie -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by 2 Cents, 2 Cents. 2 Cents said: Cash: Is It Trash or King? http://goo.gl/fb/V3Ukd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by 2 Cents, 2 Cents. 2 Cents said: Cash: Is It Trash or King? <a href="http://goo.gl/fb/V3Ukd" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/fb/V3Ukd</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

