Most of us can read the writing on the wall; we just assume it’s addressed to someone else.
~Ivern Ball
Market and economic commentary over the past few months has contained numerous references to walls. Setting aside the irony of the fact that the seat of American capitalism rests on Wall Street, we’ve also heard about the wall of water that washed over Japan and subsequently complicated the global macroeconomic picture. Add that to the Wall of Worry.
There are 3 kinds of walls mentioned in a lot of market discussions these days. Each one seems to take its turn in the spotlight and ironically, bulls and bears alike seem to be able to use all 3 walls to build their case. The one left standing may determine your investment success over the medium to long term. In the short-term, of course, anything can happen.
I’m talking about the Wall of Worry, the Wall of Debt, and the Wall of Money. Let’s take a look at each of them to see how they’re constructed and how the bulls and bears might view them differently.
The Wall of Worry
Most of you have heard of this one before. The Wall of Worry is made up of all of the things investors worry about. Your Wall of Worry probably looks different than mine. One investment advisory identified 50 reasons to reduce your risk. (Hat tip: Rob Carrick)
It is said that great bull markets have to climb a wall of worry. I’m not sure that’s ever been more true than it is today. This market has rightly been dubbed the “Teflon market.” You can throw anything at it and it just keeps going higher.
The globe is awash in debt. Geopolitical tensions are rising. The world’s third largest economy just suffered an unprecedented series of natural and human-assisted disasters. Any one of these could have put a serious ding in the major averages. None of them have been able to scratch that Teflon.
Bulls will say “Case closed.” You’ve just defined a bull market. As long as the indices continue to shrug off bad news, the bull market is still in force.
The bears will likely remind us that cooking with Teflon can be hazardous to your health. You may not see the effects for a while, but it eventually takes its toll. They point to the Wall of Worry and warn that the fact that it hasn’t fallen on top of us yet doesn’t mean it won’t at some point.
The Wall of Debt
The massive tally of global debt, is, in theory, just another brick in the Wall of Worry. But the problem is large enough, and complex enough to warrant its own wall. Greece, Ireland, and Portugal have all been battling to maintain the confidence of the bond markets while the U.S. and U.K. try to wrestle their own mounting fiscal crises. If the debt problems are not resolved, the economic recovery will fail, and we could easily face another financial crisis.
The bears will argue that solutions to the debt crisis have so far involved taking on more debt. That will never work, they say. Bondholders will need to take their haircuts and banks will need to take a hit. That will spawn instability in the markets for a time, but we’ll have a healthier financial system in the end.
The bulls will counter as follows: While multi-trillion dollar bailouts may have exacerbated the debt problem, they have in fact saved us from another Great Depression. Just look at the major averages. Most have doubled from their March 2009 lows. Things are starting to look a lot better in the real economy as well. With the possible exception of the U.S. housing market, confidence is returning.
Once the real economy starts firing on all cylinders again, we can eventually grow our way out of debt. So say the bulls. But the bears are warning that that ship has sailed. The numbers have simply become too large. Soon, servicing the debt will become an issue and borrowing costs will rise, accelerating the eventual crisis point.
The Wall of Money
The Wall of Money could refer to the massive liquidity central banks have provided by way of various iterations of Quantitative Easing. It could also refer to the seemingly infinite taxpayer backstop of global financial institutions. Most likely, it’s composed of both.
The bulls hail Ben Bernanke as the saviour of the global financial system. They point to the swift actions of governments and central banks as the reason behind the economic recovery. Don’t fight the Fed. You’ll be destroyed by the money tsunami.
The bears counter that the market rally, while impressive and unpredictable (at least by the bears), is nothing but a mirage. It may be built on a wall of money, but that money is only made of paper and therefore cannot provide a solid economic foundation. The rally can go further, but is doomed to fail in the end as reality blows away the flimsy wall of money. Real economic prosperity requires real economic growth.
Navigating the Labyrinth
When I listen to the arguments of the bulls, I can see their points. When I listen to the bears, their ideas make sense too. In order to be profitable over the next few years, investors are going to need to understand how the 3 walls we’ve described today are affecting global markets.
So far, the bulls have had the upper hand. Traders have climbed the Wall of Worry, shaken off the Wall of Debt and embraced the Wall of Money. But the bears may have their day yet. The Wall of Worry is getting larger. The Wall of Debt is too. And the Wall of Money may not hold up forever.
How are you navigating this 3-walled maze?



Great article as always. The other way to look at it is how these walls are affecting you and your personal finances as opposed to how they will affect the bulls and bears of the stock market. That might be a more effective use of time given that you have more control over your finances that you do over the stock markets.
Jim
Excellent point Jim. Listening to the bulls and bears all the time can make you pretty dizzy – or maybe it’s just me.
Either way, it’s a lot easier – and sometimes more productive – to concentrate on your own personal finances. Get the basics in order before you dive into the deep end. As you said, it’s always best to focus on controlling what you can and these 3 walls will likely affect your personal finances as well.
I began studying investing in the mid-1990s. One thing that really got on my nerves was that on any topic you could find experts on both sides of the argument. So listening to “experts” got you absolutely nowhere. Things just went around and around in circles.
I found the answer to this problem when I learned about my friends the Buy-and-Holders. They used data and research as their guide. Data and research are objective. The numbers say what the numbers say.
Then I discovered that the Buy-and-Holders don’t count valuations in their analyses. Buy-and-Hold is rooted in the research of Fama, who posits that stocks are always priced properly and that thus overvaluation and undervaluation are meaningless concepts. I don’t believe this. So I ended up coming up with my own approach (Valuation-Informed Indexing) that is like Buy-and-Hold in every way except that valuations are taken into consideration.
I am trying to make two points: (1) Buy-and-Hold was a huge advance because it was the first investing strategy that is rooted in something objective and thus can actually lead to actionable conclusions in which you can have confidence; and (2) the human capacity to rationalize is so great that we cannot even agree on what the number say.
Still, I would rather argue with the Buy-and-Holders about what the numbers say than follow an approach that is not at least partially objective. I find it maddening to go around and around in circles hearing different subjective opinions about what is going to happen to my money. I accept that we cannot know everything. But the things that I cannot know I just do not bother trying to know; I just write that stuff off as “the unknown.” I don’t want to spend time worrying about that stuff.
My personal view is that we can know enough with a high degree of confidence to be reasonably effective investors. I tune out the stuff I cannot know. I don’t know where stocks are headed over the next year and I do not care where stocks are headed over the next year. I am 100 percent with the Buy-and-Holders re that one. Re that one, John Bogle and I are soul brothers.
Rob
I do find it interesting to study some of the variables that are affecting the economy, but I agree that trying to divine near-term market direction from them is a good way to drive yourself crazy. When I look at these things, I’m just looking to understand where the break points are located so that I don’t get caught too much off guard.
I love the way Valuation-Informed-Indexing allows us to tune out the noise and focus on the fundamentals. The trader in me, however, can’t help but look at the technical picture as well. I’ve always thought that my ideal portfolio would be based mostly on the type of approach you advocate, but that I would still like to keep a little “fun money” on the side. I suppose that combination will be different for everyone – and it should be.
Thanks for your comments Rob!
Interesting way to look at this crazy market. Best first quarter in a decade on the back of earthquakes, nuclear disasters, a tsunami, mideast unrest, and the beginning of a bombing campaign in Libya, just to name a few headlines.
If there is anything that counters those worries for me, as a buy and holder though, it has to be that equally amazing wall of profits…and that huge moat of cash that companies are sitting on right now. If only they would start hiring, though!
I find buying relatively easy. It’s the selling part that, for me, is another Mount Everest to conquer.